Cannabis Potency Testing: Challenges & Solutions

Here’s what you need to know about cannabis testing problems and fixes:

Key Issue Current Status Solution
Lab Accuracy Results vary 15-30% between labs Standardized methods + better equipment
THC Inflation Labs inflate numbers for business Stricter oversight + penalties
Testing Standards Each state has different rules Push for national standards
Equipment Quality Basic tools miss key compounds Switch to mass spectrometry

The big problem? Labs are getting THC numbers wrong – sometimes on purpose. One sample sent to 10 labs showed THC levels from 64% to 83%. That’s a huge difference.

Quick facts:

  • Cannabis testing market: $5.87B by 2031
  • Today’s strains: 20%+ THC (vs 4-6% in 1970s)
  • Failed tests: 17% in Maine, 20% for medical cannabis
  • Price impact: Each 1% THC boost = 1-2% price increase

What’s changing:

  1. Mass spectrometry testing (more accurate)
  2. Strict new rules starting 2024
  3. Lab networks sharing data
  4. Better quality control

Bottom line: Cannabis testing is broken, but new tech and tougher rules are fixing it. Labs must use better equipment and follow the same rules to get numbers you can trust.

"When you walk into a store and see a label that says 10% CBD, you want to know that you can trust that number." – Brent Wilson, NIST research chemist

Main Problems in Potency Testing

Equipment and Method Problems

Labs struggle with testing accuracy. Even with HPLC as the main testing tool, results bounce all over the place between different labs.

Testing Challenge Impact on Results
Extraction Issues Key compounds get left behind in samples
Calibration Problems Reference samples don’t match real products
Storage Problems Sample quality drops over time
Method Differences No two labs follow the same steps

Sample Prep Issues

Here’s something that’ll make you think: When ONE cannabis sample went to 10 different labs, THC results came back anywhere from 64% to 83%.

Why such a mess? It comes down to basics:

  • Samples aren’t mixed well
  • Wrong storage temperatures
  • Different handling between labs
  • Zero standard methods

Rules and Laws

The numbers tell the story:

State Testing Issues
Maine 17% of products fail pesticide tests
Oregon Cut back on required microbial testing
New York Caught labs faking reports
California Had to warn labs about THC inflation

"THC inflation is pernicious, it’s easy to accomplish and there are strong financial incentives to do it." – Don Land, Professor of Chemistry and Forensics at UC Davis

Testing Quality Issues

Want to know how bad it gets? Check this out:

Issue Impact
Lab Shopping Brands hunt for higher THC numbers
False Results 78% miss pesticides that ARE there
CBD Mislabeling 69% show wrong amounts
Price Impact Each 1% THC bump = 1-2% price increase

Oregon’s 2019 audit dropped this bomb: The state’s testing system "cannot ensure that test results are reliable and products are safe." Why? Not enough staff and poor processes.

"Inter-laboratory variation is a serious problem in our industry." – Brian C. Smith, PhD, Founder of Big Sur Scientific

How to Fix Testing Problems

Here’s what you need to know about improving cannabis testing accuracy:

Testing Equipment That Works

Labs need the right tools – and they need to use them correctly. Here’s what works:

Equipment Type Purpose Key Benefit
HPLC Systems Cannabinoid Analysis Gets accurate THC/CBD readings without heat damage
Near-infrared Spectroscopy Quick Testing Tests samples without destroying them
Moisture Analyzers Sample Prep Makes sure samples are ready for testing
Arium® Water Systems Lab Operations Provides pure water for better results

What NIST‘s Program Does

NIST

NIST created CannaQAP to help labs test better. Here’s the breakdown:

Program Element Details
Reference Materials Hemp oil samples with exact compound amounts
Measurement Tasks Tests for THC, CBD + 15 other cannabinoids
Data Sharing Labs see how they stack up against others
Future Plans Will add terpene and contaminant testing

Making Your Lab Better

Want better results? Do these things:

  • Follow ISO/IEC 17025:2017 methods
  • Test your skills against other labs
  • Write down EVERYTHING you do
  • Make sure staff knows the right way to test
  • Keep good records

Better Ways to Test

What to Fix Why It Matters
Sample Prep Steps Gets the same results every time
Digital Records Stops mistakes from bad handwriting
Watch the Temperature Keeps samples fresh
Check Equipment Often Makes sure numbers are right

"When you walk into a store or dispensary and see a label that says 10% CBD, you want to know that you can trust that number." – Brent Wilson, NIST research chemist

Here’s proof it works:

"The Sartorius moisture analyzers have been a great addition to our lab. They are simple to use, efficient, accurate and the ability to add more modules to maintain throughput was huge for us." – Conner D. Griffeth, COO of Level One Labs

sbb-itb-430f9b7

Industry-Wide Fixes

The cannabis testing world is changing fast. Here’s how labs are stepping up their game:

Working Together

SCIEX and CW Analytical (CWAL) have teamed up to fix a big problem: making cannabis testing more accurate.

What They’re Doing How They’re Doing It
Building Standard Tests Providing LC-MS/MS equipment + MultiQuant™ Software
Making Testing Cheaper Setting up day-to-day testing steps
Helping All Labs Sharing their methods with everyone

"This team-up with SCIEX is huge. It shows that big players in the testing world want to help cannabis labs succeed." – Robert Martin, Ph.D, Co-Founder, Chief Operating Officer at CW Analytical

Better Rules

The Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) isn’t messing around. They’re rolling out strict new testing rules:

When What’s New
Oct 1, 2023 New ways to test potency start
Jan 1, 2024 Everyone must follow new rules
Jan 1, 2024 $50 extra fee for R&D and compliance tests

What’s changing? Labs will:

  • Test for 9 cannabinoids (soon to be 15)
  • Stop labs from competing on potency results
  • See fewer inflated THC numbers
  • Help DCC spot weird test results

Quality Checks

NIST’s CannaQAP program is stepping in with some serious tools:

What They Offer Why It Matters
Lab Comparison Studies Shows how labs stack up
Open Results Everyone can see NIST’s findings
Testing Checkups Helps labs spot problems
Testing Standards Sets clear benchmarks

The Cannabis Science Task Force (CSTF) is also pitching in by:

  • Getting science teams to work together
  • Setting potency testing standards
  • Running state-level testing programs
  • Using science to get solid data

Every lab needs to follow ISO/IEC 17025 rules and think hard about risks. There’s even a guide that helps labs across different states test the same way, using methods backed by science.

Making Changes Work

Labs need both quick wins and long-term solutions. Here’s what’s working now and what needs to happen next.

Today’s Solutions That Work

The fastest way to boost accuracy? Start with these proven fixes:

Fix What It Does Results
Double-Check System Two people verify each result Catches mistakes fast
Digital Sample Tags Scans track every sample Stops mix-ups
Hands-On Training Shows exact testing steps Builds confidence
Daily Equipment Tests Spots problems early Keeps tests accurate

LabWare GROW users cut their work time by 15-20%. The system helps catch issues before they become problems.

Building Better Labs

Want lasting improvements? Focus on these three areas:

1. Smart Software

LIMS software changes everything. It:

  • Shows who touched each sample
  • Records every prep step
  • Saves all validation data
  • Connects samples to results

2. Strong Teams

Learn from CCTL’s mistakes – they lost their license because of staff issues. Here’s what works:

  • Hire chemistry experts
  • Build test-specific teams
  • Document all training
  • Define each role clearly

3. Tighter Rules

State Rule Change Status
New York Test every batch In effect
California Penalties for bad results In effect
Maine Must check pesticides In effect

"The DCC is doing something. They’re not going to allow this s**t to go on anymore." – Josh Swider, CEO of Infinite Chemical Analysis Labs

The numbers tell the story. In New York, one product showed 28.5% THC but actually had 17.7%. Five out of eight top strains had 25% less THC than claimed.

Speed isn’t everything – Maine’s data proves it. When they tested medical samples, 20% failed pesticide checks. Getting accurate results beats getting fast ones.

What’s Next

Testing is changing fast. Here’s what you need to know:

New Testing Tools

Labs are getting better tools that work faster and smarter:

Tool What It Does Key Benefit
BSS 3000 Portable Analyzer Tests 7 cannabinoids in 5 minutes Works in fields and labs
Axcend Focus LC Portable HPLC system Uses less solvent, more sensitive
E-Nose Devices Detects compound profiles Checks product quality fast
Mass Spectrometry Systems Advanced cannabinoid analysis 50-500x more sample dilution

The BSS 3000 runs for 8 hours on batteries. Teams can test anywhere with ±2% accuracy by weight.

"The Focus LC delivers greater sensitivity than traditional UV-absorption-based HPLC systems." – Damon Anderson, PhD

Where Testing is Going

The market’s growing FAST – from $13.2B in 2022 to $40B by 2030. Here are the big changes:

1. Laws Are Changing Everything

California’s A.B. 2188 kicks in January 1, 2024. It blocks employers from using old THC tests. This affects 4.2 million workers.

"Instead of responding to changing laws by discontinuing THC testing, a better option is likely to re-evaluate the available tools that support workplace safety goals while enabling compliance with the recent use obligations of the new laws." – Aaron Atkinson, Executive Vice President of Marketing, Hound Labs

2. Labs Are Getting Smarter

Update Impact
RFID Tags Track samples instantly
Robot Handlers Mix samples perfectly
AI Analysis Spots trends in test data
Blockchain Shows every test step

3. Testing Goes Deeper

Labs now look beyond basic THC and CBD. They test:

  • Full cannabinoid profiles
  • Terpene levels
  • Product safety
  • Growing conditions

"Introducing mass spectrometry-based potency analysis will increase the rigor of the data provided by the laboratory and position the laboratory to be method-compliant as additional regulatory standards are established." – Ben Southwell, Assistant Professor of Bio-Analytical Chemistry, Lake Superior State University

Wrap-Up

Here’s what’s wrong with cannabis testing – and how to fix it:

Problem Why It Matters
Lab Shopping Companies pick labs that show higher THC numbers
Basic Testing Tools Old methods miss important details
Product Types Each product needs different testing
No Set Rules States do their own thing

Better tech is changing the game:

New Method What It Does
Mass Spec Testing Gets better results with less sample
All-in-One Testing Checks all pesticides in one go
Better HPLC Handles tricky products better
QSight Tests faster than before

What needs to happen next?

1. Switch to Better Tech

Labs need to use mass spectrometry. It’s more accurate and helps meet stricter rules.

2. Stop the Games

"When a producer knowingly chooses to test with a high-biased laboratory or collaborates with that laboratory to achieve high-biased results, they are defrauding the consumer." – Douglas Duncan, Laboratory Director of Kairos Labs

3. Get Everyone on the Same Page

Need Action
Same Methods Make one set of rules
Better Labs Start lab certification
Work Together Connect lab networks
Keep People Safe Test everything required

"Regardless of whether addressing medical cannabis patients or recreational adult use, an accurate understanding of the dosing of primary ingredients is critical in support of the cannabis community and research of the associated clinical science, just as with all other foods and drugs in the US community." – Reverend Dr. Kymron De Cesare, Chief Research Officer at Steep Hill Inc.

Related posts